Abstract |
Phenomenology`s perspective, the reason of design is `for human`, that is to make a better living environment. The problem is that who is the man. The human is `I`, and could be `you` may be. The purpose of the design depends on who the man is. Heidegger was limited only by human individuals. so did not address the issue of human and humans.
Disciple of Heidegger, Arendt incorporated phenomenology to politics. so solved the problem. Arendt has been divided human behavior into labor, work, act. labor, work, act is the result `active life`. Individual`s behavior is also politics. Arendt called the political space is `public realm`, and member`s area is called `private realm`.
Come to modern, `public realm` is being invaded `private realm`. To fulfill its original purpose and function of the `public realm` activation is required. Our`s public realm of design is weak that by consumer`s participation. First, the consumer must be involved into the policy process of design to make a public realm of design. |
|
|
Key Words |
디자인소통구조, 활동적 삶, 공론영역, Design-communication-structure, vita-activa, public realm |
|
|
|
|